Which countries protect intellectual property the case of software piracy

Can the software industry control software piracy without government help? Why would the software industry dislike greater government regulation? How do you think customers in wealthier countries versus those in poorer countries justify software piracy?

Can you envision a scenario where companies and consumers reach a relationship that eliminates the profitability of piracy—whether it is for software, music, movies and other digital products? What is ethics? Why is ethics important to the study of international management? This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.

Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website.

Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website.

These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Nicita, A. Key statistics and trends in international trade Nill, A. Global software piracy: Trends and strategic considerations.

Business Horizons, 52 , — Patent Technology Monitoring Team. Patent Statistics Chart Calendar Years — Piquero, N. Causes and prevention of intellectual property crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 8 4 , 40— Democracy and intellectual property: Examining trajectories of software piracy. Raudenbush, S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods second ed.

Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Robertson, C. Trade liberalization, corruption, and software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics , — An analysis of the predictors of software piracy within Latin America. Journal of Buisness Research, 61 , — Rusche, G. Punishment and social structure. New York: Columbia University Press. Sang, Y. Understanding the intentions behind illegal downloading: A comparative study of American and Korean college students.

Telematics and Informatics, 32 , — Shadlen, K. The political economy of intellectual property protection: The case of software. International Studies Quarterly, 49 , 45— Shah, A. The ethics of intellectual property rights in an era of globalization. Human Rights and Disability , — Shangquan, G.

Economic globalization: Trends, risks and risk prevention. Sum, N. Informational capitalism and U. Critical Asian Studies, 35 , — Sutherlin, J. Intellectual property rights. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 8 , — Swinyard, W. The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 9 , — The Business Software Alliance.

Tonry, M. Remodeling American sentencing: A ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. United Nations Development Programme. Human development report Work for human development. New York: United Nations. Van Kranenburg, H. Multimedia, entertainment, and business software copyright piracy: A cross-national study. Journal of Media Economics, 18 2 , — Vida, I. Predicting consumer digital piracy behavior: The role of rationalization and perceived consequences.

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6 , — Wooldridge, J. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Evaluation Methods. Program Evaluation. Educational Technology. Case Studies. Research Methodology. Curriculum Development. College Faculty. Educational Policy. Journal of Chemical Education.

ProQuest LLC. Phi Delta Kappan. Child Development. Research in Higher Education. Journal of Agricultural…. School Library Media…. Educational and Psychological…. Psychology in the Schools. Developmental Psychology. Journal of Autism and…. Journal of Vocational Behavior. Online Submission. Journal of Consulting and…. Journal of Counseling…. American Psychologist.

Association of American…. Educational Leadership. Journal of Education for…. College Student Journal. Journal of Speech, Language,….

Mental Retardation. Orfield, Gary. Pike, Gary R. McLean, Gary N. Gottfredson, Gary D. Peterson, Gary W. Ladd, Gary W. Canivez, Gary L. Siperstein, Gary N. Borich, Gary D. Henry, Gary T. Natriello, Gary. Rhoades, Gary. Blau, Gary. Beckner, Gary, Ed.

Olson, Gary A. Griffin, Gary A. Morrison, Gary R. Bowen, Gary L. This type of license is similar to the former, except that the code to activate the software is delivered via software that is installed or downloaded to a specific device. This type of license is also a code that is installed or downloaded to the device, but it can be shared among users on a network, or otherwise accessed on multiple devices.

This model is an excellent solution if your company is trying to figure out how to protect intellectual property online. It can be especially cost-effective if a customer needs multiple users or devices to access the software, but not all at once.

If for example a company with devices purchases a floating license that gives access for up to 10 users at once, the user who needs to access it sends a request for access to a central license server, and the server provides the license based on availability. Another way of providing access to users from multiple devices is the named user or per-seat license: a license that can only be activated by a particular user who signs in with specific credentials.

This is useful if a company knows that only specific employees will need to access this software. For example, if the company has a team of designers that work with Adobe Photoshop, you can purchase a per-seat license for that team. Hybrid models. Many software vendors choose to offer a range or combination of different types of software licenses to best suit the needs of their clients.

Many of the license models listed above can be mixed and matched. For example, a company may prefer per-seat licenses for a team of employees who need to access the software regularly, and a concurrent license for a different team that needs to access it only occasionally. Clients who have a cost-effective and simple way to access the software are much more likely to use it legally and much less likely to try and find workarounds.

Sentinel LDK includes a wide range of out-of-the-box licensing and entitlement management features, providing software vendors with excellent intellectual property protection as well as maximizing revenues, simplifying operational processes, and enhancing the end-user experience.

Discover more about how Thales can help you protect your software IP. Defending Against The Quadruple Threat to Intellectual Property - White Paper Technology and innovation have never moved faster and most of it involved software in form or another. Learn how Thales can help you protect against the quadruple threat of intellectual property What Is Software IP?